sabindero-blog asked: It seems as though art is often categorized into two groups: art that is ultimately autobiographical (or at least, heavily informed by the creator's experience), and art that is more commentary by nature (less focused on the creator's identity and experience). Being aware that a majority of your work would appear to be in comics, does either approach appeal to you more, and do you consider either to be superior in most ways?

Neither is better, but I think the ability to switch between genres as I please keeps me fresh in both areas.  When you need a break from one, you swivel your chair around to your second.

1. speakingofinspiration reblogged this from huntersirrelevantinterests
2. intermittentconstant-blog reblogged this from beatonna
3. bourtange liked this
4. dieselbookstore liked this
5. brokenchairuniverse liked this
6. huntersirrelevantinterests reblogged this from beatonna
7. zachinoprimo liked this
8. lilietsblog liked this
9. lorettark liked this
10. staying-gold liked this
11. inga-don-studio liked this
12. khancrackers liked this
13. flawful-ish liked this
14. national-radio-victory-fire liked this
15. tadthemad liked this
16. sabindero-blog reblogged this from beatonna
17. sabindero-blog liked this
18. alltingfinns liked this
19. boscothemigh liked this
20. something-boring liked this
21. wombat-shaped liked this
22. duckpho liked this
23. thataaronjshay liked this
24. pendletonpl97801 liked this
25. lordtableshark liked this
26. coughingkate liked this
27. bunnyramram-blog liked this
28. numerosix liked this
29. librarianpirate liked this
30. jessfink liked this
31. beekeep liked this
32. therealbrigeedarocks liked this
33. foxears liked this
34. zenosanalytic liked this
35. seemssostrange liked this
36. wickdaggler liked this
37. cakeandpi liked this
38. imathers liked this
39. beatonna posted this
40. Show more notesLoading...